“It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change”. – L. C. Megginson
We often get stuck in our ways, but, in this economy, there’s no room for changelessness. More and more law firms are recognizing the importance and value in cross selling services between practice groups. Traditionally handled with trepidation and often avoided, cross selling offers opportunities for organic growth and business development. Unfortunately, there are a number of hindrances when it comes to successfully fostering cross selling; namely, the fact that lawyers can be territorial and even hostile to the idea of sharing clients between practice groups.
While the prospect of change is not often met with smiles and open arms, it is essential if a firm is going to continue to develop and to keep up with the times. In our work with law firms over the years, here are a few approaches to cross selling that we’ve seen achieve success:
Approach 1: Eliminate Origination Credits & Traditional Boundaries
Origination credits have long been an issue of contention in many firms. Permanent credits encourage lawyers to sit back and not generate any new business. Lawyers can lose their incentive to work since they are already receiving compensation for work others do. Permanent credits also discourage lawyers without them to cross sell being that they won’t receive credit. Overall, whether shared or permanent, origination credits inhibit growth and internal collaboration between and within practice groups.
One law firm we know has eliminated the origination credits all together, and as a result, they’ve seen traditional boundaries and issues preventing cross selling virtually disappear. Incentives for new business development and cross selling are bonuses, not origination credits. While this may upset some, it will foster productivity and business between practice groups.
Approach 2: Handle Lateral Integration with Care
With many firms taking on laterals recently, there have been reports of dissatisfaction from both the laterals and the firms. Frequently, laterals feel neglected by their mentors, while firms admit lack of due diligence and onboarding support. The key is to involve the firm’s marketing department early in the game to facilitate early lateral integration. Specific integration and business development programs allow laterals to begin the process in earnest and provide the parent firm’s management with its direct responsibilities.
Approach 3: Restructure Firm from Practice Groups to Industry Groups
It might seem like you’re turning the firm inside-out and upside-down, but restructuring from the traditional practice groups to industry groups will foster successful business development and break down conventional boundaries between groups. Several chief marketing offers at the Law Firm Marketing and Business Development Leadership Forum discussed that their recent switch to industry groups has been extremely successful. Some noted an increase in energy and closing of business. One change that had a marked difference was the addition of a business manager position and his or her ability to coordinate marketing, outreach, research, proposals, and pitches. The business manager becomes an asset to the group with specific industry knowledge to provide high success for marketing.
Allowing and cultivating dissention and boundaries between lawyers is the quickest way to hinder business development and cross selling. While some of these approaches may not work for your firm, discussing the possibility of change and new options is a step in the direction of new possibilities internally. The goal is business development and getting to the RED ZONE.